The Agent Argumentation Architecture Revisited⋆
نویسندگان
چکیده
The Agent Argumentation Architecture (AAA) has been recently proposed [1] as an abstract model by means of which an autonomous agent argues with itself to manage its motivations and arbitrate its possibly conflicting internal goals. In an attempt to show how the AAA model can be instantiated, we revisit the original model with a concrete argumentation framework illustrating how the internal dialectic process can be specified as a dialogue-game between internal components representing the agent’s mental faculties. The resulting framework is exemplified with an intuitive case, illustrating the importance of argumentation to develop models of cognitive agents with motivations.
منابع مشابه
ABA: Argumentation Based Agents
Many works have identified the potential benefits of using argumentation to address a large variety of multiagent problems. In this paper we take this idea one step further and develop the concept of a fully integrated argumentation-based agent architecture that allows us to develop agents that are coherently designed on an underlying argumentation based foundation. Under this architecture, an ...
متن کاملPractical Reasoning in an Argumentation-based Decision BDI Agent: a Case Study for Participatory Management of Protected Areas
This paper describes the implementation of an argumentation system used for participatory management of environmental protected areas, more precisely to model the decision of a park manager artificial agent. This implementation is based on a BDI agent architecture, namely the Jason/AgentSpeak framework/language. After introducing the principles of BDI architecture and of argumentation systems, ...
متن کاملCombining goal generation and planning in an argumentation framework
In this paper we use formal argumentation theory to study the deliberation cycle of the BOID cognitive agent architecture. We combine goal generation with a planning approach recently proposed by Leila Amgoud. In her formal argumentation framework plans for fulfilling a desire are represented just like arguments that support a conclusion; the framework can thus deal with conflicting desires. In...
متن کاملInteractive Form-Generation in High-Performance Architecture Theory
Architecture as a designerly way of thinking and knowing is to interact with its environment. The manuscript is to speculate “interactive form-generation” based on high-performance architecture theory, and discuss the precursors and the potentials. The research aims to explore and determine the roots, aspects of interactive architecture as a part of performance-based design in contemporary arch...
متن کاملRealizing Argumentation in Multi-agent Systems Using Defeasible Logic Programming
We describe a working multi-agent architecture based on Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP) by Garcı́a and Simari where agents are engaged in an argumentation to reach a common conclusion. Due to the distributed approach personalities and opinions of the individual agents give rise to arguments and counterarguments concerning a particular query. We establish a sound theoretical framework of a sp...
متن کامل